<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Providing Some Context</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.assortedstuff.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.assortedstuff.com/?p=3009</link>
	<description>Just what it says!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:27:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Mathews</title>
		<link>http://www.assortedstuff.com/?p=3009&#038;cpage=1#comment-83593</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Mathews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.assortedstuff.com/?p=3009#comment-83593</guid>
		<description>Thanks! And while I am here, I thought I might correct a tiny factual flaw in the otherwise brilliant review of my book in the Post on Sunday. The reviewer did what i sometimes do, read the material a bit too quickly. That 60 percent attrition rate is NOT for all KIPP schools in California, but for just the first class that attended just one school (KIPP Bridge in Oakland) which has since gotten much better at persuading students to stay. When I told the Book World folks that I was going to be a grown up and not take a peek at the review in our computer system before it ran, they laughed and informed me that they had erected long ago some kind of firewall that would have kept me from seeing it anyway. The story is the wall went up after another Post reporter, one of the really famous ones, checked out the Post review of one of his books in advance and complained about something. I am sure he was just striving for accuracy, as I would have if I had had the chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! And while I am here, I thought I might correct a tiny factual flaw in the otherwise brilliant review of my book in the Post on Sunday. The reviewer did what i sometimes do, read the material a bit too quickly. That 60 percent attrition rate is NOT for all KIPP schools in California, but for just the first class that attended just one school (KIPP Bridge in Oakland) which has since gotten much better at persuading students to stay. When I told the Book World folks that I was going to be a grown up and not take a peek at the review in our computer system before it ran, they laughed and informed me that they had erected long ago some kind of firewall that would have kept me from seeing it anyway. The story is the wall went up after another Post reporter, one of the really famous ones, checked out the Post review of one of his books in advance and complained about something. I am sure he was just striving for accuracy, as I would have if I had had the chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.assortedstuff.com/?p=3009&#038;cpage=1#comment-83590</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.assortedstuff.com/?p=3009#comment-83590</guid>
		<description>I will read it. It&#039;s not yet in the Fairfax County library system, but I&#039;ll be watching for it. I make an effort to read things written by folks with whom I don&#039;t agree. There is much for me to learn from them. I&#039;ll be back with more comments after reading, I&#039;m sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will read it. It&#8217;s not yet in the Fairfax County library system, but I&#8217;ll be watching for it. I make an effort to read things written by folks with whom I don&#8217;t agree. There is much for me to learn from them. I&#8217;ll be back with more comments after reading, I&#8217;m sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.assortedstuff.com/?p=3009&#038;cpage=1#comment-83589</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.assortedstuff.com/?p=3009#comment-83589</guid>
		<description>Ok, I guess I need to bump Jay&#039;s book up a little higher on my reading list. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I guess I need to bump Jay&#8217;s book up a little higher on my reading list. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Mathews</title>
		<link>http://www.assortedstuff.com/?p=3009&#038;cpage=1#comment-83587</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Mathews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.assortedstuff.com/?p=3009#comment-83587</guid>
		<description>Come on guys. Read the book. I often have the same fears about stuff written by people with whom I don&#039;t agree, but am often surprised. Let&#039;s not turn this fine blog into another exercise in unexamined assumptions. And its only $10.17 on amazon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on guys. Read the book. I often have the same fears about stuff written by people with whom I don&#8217;t agree, but am often surprised. Let&#8217;s not turn this fine blog into another exercise in unexamined assumptions. And its only $10.17 on amazon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.assortedstuff.com/?p=3009&#038;cpage=1#comment-83586</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.assortedstuff.com/?p=3009#comment-83586</guid>
		<description>I have to admit that I&#039;ve not been brave enough to pick up this book. I&#039;m afraid it would raise my blood pressure to much if I read it.

I am reading Paul Tough&#039;s book &#039;Whatever It Takes&#039; about Geoffrey Canada&#039;s work in Harlem. Aspects of it are frustrating me as well, but Canada&#039;s take on KIPP is fascinating. He believes that his goals are very different from KIPP&#039;s. He wants to &#039;contaminate&#039; Harlem with hard work, positive attitudes, and good parenting. In that way he believes that it is possible for the entire area to improve. He believes that KIPP wants to isolate the best students in a bad neighborhood in order to get them out of there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that I&#8217;ve not been brave enough to pick up this book. I&#8217;m afraid it would raise my blood pressure to much if I read it.</p>
<p>I am reading Paul Tough&#8217;s book &#8216;Whatever It Takes&#8217; about Geoffrey Canada&#8217;s work in Harlem. Aspects of it are frustrating me as well, but Canada&#8217;s take on KIPP is fascinating. He believes that his goals are very different from KIPP&#8217;s. He wants to &#8216;contaminate&#8217; Harlem with hard work, positive attitudes, and good parenting. In that way he believes that it is possible for the entire area to improve. He believes that KIPP wants to isolate the best students in a bad neighborhood in order to get them out of there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
