How can a parent judge if one high school is better than another? According to a New York Times article from this weekend, there are a “daunting” number of high profile rankings of the best US high schools published this time of year to help them make that determination.
As a public service to aid “anxious consumers”, the writer sets about to analyze one of those lists in order to understand how anyone could “quantify something as complex and nuanced as a high-quality education”.
The writer does a great job of picking apart their system and it’s worth reading the whole thing.
But for this rant, let’s just cut to the bottom line. Where are the best schools?
Want the best high schools for your child? Move to Texas or Florida. Texas has 15 of the 100 best, placing second over all nationwide, while Florida has 10, the fourth most.
Read that again: 25% of the 100 best high schools in the country are in Texas and Florida.
This is no doubt due in good part to the reform efforts of George W. and Jeb Bush, who — like Newsweek — have made standardized test results a true measure of academic excellence.
That would be my guess.
At all costs, avoid Scarsdale, N.Y. It didn’t even make the top 1,000. Though its average SAT score of 1935 would rank it 21st among the 100 best, the school does not offer A.P. courses, and Newsweek counts A.P. data as 40 percent of the rating.
No AP courses??? I know someone who would consider that child abuse.
However, forget about the quality of Newsweek’s selection process. There’s another, far more important bottom line to consider in their decision to publish a Best American High School list (not to mention the Post’s multiple annual floggings of the “challenge”).
Given that magazines and newspapers are bleeding to death, this is the only plausible justification I can think of: Lists are cash cows.
End of story.