A few weeks ago I spend a chunk of my Sunday at an odd little conference held in the threadbare ballrooms at one of DC’s utility hotels. The meeting was a combination of a micro version of the ISTE expo, an edtech pitchfest, and an attempt at a teacher pep rally.
As I said: odd.
The event was the Tech for Schools Summit, presented in various locations around the US by a company called edSurge. For those who don’t follow the edtech “sector” and haven’t heard of them, here’s the nutshell description in their own words:
EdSurge was started in 2011… to connect the emerging community of edtech entrepreneurs and educators. We wanted to share detailed information about what new technologies could–and could not–do to support learning.
However, the short time I spent at the summit didn’t leave me feeling very good about that “emerging community”.
About thirty small companies participated in this event, each of them showing off their creations at tables in a cramped, noisy room as well as giving a short pitch on the stage in another space. None of them did a good job explaining either what their product did or why any educator would want to use it. If I was a wealthy investor, I would pass on all of them.
Anyway, my biggest problem was with the concept behind their products. Except for two tables1, these edtech “entrepreneurs” presented very little that involved students in creating their own learning.
They were showing technology grafted to the same old curriculum and classroom process, aligned to the Common Core, of course. Very little innovation in either the “ed” or the “tech” part of the equation.
And that pretty much sums up the current state of that whole edtech “sector”.
Ironically both small subdivisions of Autodesk, a very large, well-established company.↩