A New York Times columnist recently compared the upbeat appearances by President Bush in the last few weeks to the dancing of Gene Kelly.
Kelly’s widow didn’t care for the association. At all!
Re “Soft Shoe in Hard Times” (column, March 16):
Surely it must have been a slip for Maureen Dowd to align the artistry of my late husband, Gene Kelly, with the president’s clumsy performances. To suggest that “George Bush has turned into Gene Kelly” represents not only an implausible transformation but a considerable slight. If Gene were in a grave, he would have turned over in it.
When Gene was compared to the grace and agility of Jack Dempsey, Wayne Gretzky and Willie Mays, he was delighted. But to be linked with a clunker – particularly one he would consider inept and demoralizing – would have sent him reeling.
Graduated with a degree in economics from Pitt, Gene was not only a gifted dancer, director and choreographer, he was also a most civilized man. He spoke multiple languages; wrote poetry; studied history; understood the projections of Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes. He did the Sunday Times crossword in ink. Exceedingly articulate, Gene often conveyed more through movement than others manage with words.
Sadly, President Bush fails to communicate meaningfully with either. For George Bush to become Gene Kelly would require impossible leaps in creativity, erudition and humility.
I learned a lot about Gene Kelly from your post. Talented people are so often gifted in more ways than one. What was that columnist thinking?
Gene Kelly is one of my personal “heart-throbs” I love the way he moves–and his artistry is unbelievable–and THANK YOU for posting this–I laughed all the way through it…