Although the past five days were very busy, now comes the hard work of unpacking.
Everyone has their own style but when I attend a conference, especially one as large and hectic as ISTE, I spend my time on the sights, sounds, and conversations, on collecting as many experiences as possible. There isn’t room for much reflection and making context.
That part starts the day after and continues for weeks or sometimes months as I sift through the fifteen or so pages (thank you Evernote!!) of session notes, ideas, URLs, sound clips, names (people, places and things), photos, email addresses, and Twitter handles, plus business cards and other assorted bits of paper.
Every element represents a potential starting point leading to something I can adapt and use in the future. Or more likely, down an interesting, albeit entertaining, rathole.
Either way, my learning continues long after the closing session.
When you take a college course, who owns the notes you take during lectures? More to the point, can students sell their notes to a company that will then turn around and sell them to other students?
Long ago, when I was in college, I remember there being at least one vendor of notes for the largest undergraduate classes, so I thought that issue was settled.
I guess not. A University of Florida professor is suing for copyright violations over sales of the notes from his class. With a digital twist, of course.
The professor involved, Michael Moulton, teaches wildlife ecology and conservation. A few years ago, starting with the notes that he used to deliver his lectures, Moulton gradually built an electronic version of a text book. After getting the University to waive its copyright on the material, he worked with a company called Faulkner Press to copyright and formalize the material. That material is now available as a $90 CD that includes audio-visual material, study guides, and practice examine questions. It’s apparently required material for any students enrolled in Moulton’s class.
Meanwhile, a company called Class Notes, doing business as Einstein’s Notes, was performing the typical service of collecting notes and class materials, and selling them to students. In the process, the suit alleges, they ran afoul of Moulton’s copyrights; Falukner seeks an injunction against their distribution of course material, plus fees and damages.
A $90 CD? Well, that’s probably cheaper than many college textbooks these days.
However, I wonder how many original ideas are in the professor’s lectures and how many he’s adapted from others. Doesn’t he owe them some of the royalties?
I have no idea, but the case is still another interesting copyright question.